About your Search

20131028
20131105
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)
intelligence james clapper james clapper,, deputy attorney the deputyes cole, director of the nsa, chris inglis. we will move immediately into the second panel of non- governmental experts knowledgeable on fisa issues. we will discuss possible changes to the way fisa applications are handled by the department of justice. i hope all of our witnesses will give clear answers about how proposals under consideration at congress would affect the nsa's ability to stop terrorist attacks. i am going to submit my statement for the record in order to ask some questions following the opening statement and your opening statements in relation to some of the news of the day to get some things clarified for the record. it will be important for the american people. .e do expect a vote we will hold as long as we can. we will take a brief intermission. there are only two votes. we should be able to recess or a short time and return. i will recognize any opening comment. for comingu, panel, here today. hopefully, we will get the facts on the table and let the american people understand what we do and how we do it.
me that golden valley: this land was made for you and me. not for them, not for the nsa, not homeland security. i've roamed and rambled and i followed my footsteps this land was made for you and me remember what we love i've roamed and rambled and i followed my footsteps to the sparkling sands of her diamond deserts; and all around me a voice was sounding: this land was made for you and me. last chorus this land is your land when the this land is my land sun came from california shining, and i to the new york island from the redwood forest to the gulf stream waters this land was made for you and me ♪ thank you, round of applause to code pink and to all of you. take back our country. thank you. [cheers and applause] >> all right. the code pink background singers, something else right there. for all of my new honorary black people, i want to let you know about the secret, black folks get nervous when white folks talk about the good old days. let's be progressive. let's keep us together. i want to shout out to john, hope i am saying it right, am i saying that right, john kee ree ack oo
and civil liberties oversight board will hold a public meeting to discuss changes to the nsa's data collection and surveillance programs. members will review programs allowing mass collection of phone records and internet data and the board will hear from the chief legal officers at the fbi, nsa, and the office of the director of national intelligence. that will be live at 9:15 a.m. on c-span2. importantthe tenants to the carrier is the idea that all americans, the matter where you live, should have access to affordable telecommunication services. as we got this evolution of going from playing telephone service to a broadband world, how do we ensure americans have access to the same services and the services that come across on those networks. we've been talking about how important it is to maintain the tenets of universal service. , what that means, and how that mechanism has allowed folks in -- folks to have customizable serpas -- services. bowlmparable lies a >> this week on q&a, stephen kinzer discusses his new book, titled "the brothers: john foster dulles, allen dulles, and th
. that is not what i wanted to talk about. i want to talk about the fact that the nsa surveillance has been going on further than the bush era. it is been going back to j edgar hoover when they eavesdrop on martin luther king, jr. and they blackmailed him. i was wondering if you could speak on that. thank you. guest: i do not know what your question is, exactly, but the nsa, which did not exist until 1952 -- the nsa has gone beyond what anyone realized. it's hard to believe a terrorist would call her up and say i am a terrorist, i thought you would i thought i would let you know that we are going to blow up a building. host: we make of the revelations overall of the work that the nsa is doing -- what do you make of the revelations overall of what the work that the nsa is doing? guest: the nsa is an important agency. it seems they have gone beyond what anyone suspected they could be doing. i do not think their collection of metadata is not over her, but logged. -- not overheard, but logged. that seems to be going beyond what is necessary. if they have a bad guy, they can put in for a warrant. they
. this may be, but i don't know. host: what about the statement that the president was not aware that the nsa was tapping the phone of government leaders? guest: they said the president was generally aware of what the nsa was doing, but they have not specifically said he has known about -- that he knew about merkel or other allied leaders. it is probably true. critics will say, why didn't he know? you cannot win. it is a catch-22. they never expected to have snowden's revelations all over the place. it means there is almost an end to secrecy. first you had the wiki leaks, private manning, and now you have edward snowden who has caused and international -- an international uproar. it makes you wonder whether the government can preserve some of the secrets because there are young people who have other ideas and they are willing to take the risk of putting them out. it is an interesting and relatively new development that makes it hard. some secrets should be kept, but it is a question of degree. it looks as though the nsa was doing too much. they have to do some things, obviously. there has to
? >> on the second one first, we are actually having the fisa judges up to nsa tomorrow. will go through and see what our folks do. on the first one, this is where this committee made a mistake. thought we had written and the way we meant for information to go into it was not the way we represented that to the court in multiple representations. translatingtake in a technical to a legal framework. what i told the committee for years ago, i think the people who made that mistake made an honest mistake. i had those people in my room. said ok,to them, and i that is an honest mistake. we carried them forward. we looked at it, and we decided jointly with this committee and others that we needed to set up a director of compliance that gives us more rigor in looking at court orders in a way that was technically compliant. we have done that. we are going through the rigorous process. all of our fisa applications are being wire brushed to ensure they are exactly right. and of course, while doing that, we are going to find mistakes, and we are rooting them out as wee by mistake. so, finish this up, what that me
, this is an unrelated issue, but to the tensions over spying and nsa stuff, is a damaging to the prospects for a cheap tip agreement. 48ttip agreement. i think you have heard from a number of european officials that they see the logic of isng ahead withttip/ important to the strategy. we are hopeful we will be able to continue to make progress on that. we have teams in brussels as we speak. they are in negotiations that had to be canceled due to the shutdown of the government. now they're back on track. we hope to continue those discussions in the coming weeks. >> a number of people have mentioned regulatory alignment. can you give us more detail of what that means in practice? if you are bmw, one of the challenges of having different regulatory regimes on the sides of the atlantic and what kind of savings would you be looking at if those were better aligned? >> one as obvious a crash testing. cars have to be crashed in a different way in europe than they funnily enough, and mexico, mexico has the european crash testing. over the border, there must be some different animal living, because there are d
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)